come know jesus.Start your journey
← Mark

A word to share.

Send this reading to someone you love.

He Has Risen, and His Promise Still Stands

9 min readScripture · Reflection · Prayer

Read Mark 16 in the ESV, including the manuscript note before the longer ending. In chapter 15, Jesus died and was buried in a tomb whose location the women observed. They return expecting to care for his body. Instead, they receive an announcement that changes the meaning of everything they have witnessed.

The book introduction traces Jesus' authority, service, suffering, and resurrection. This final chapter brings those themes to the tomb. The one who gave his life has risen. His disciples' failures have not overturned his promise to meet them again. We will first follow the women through the empty tomb, then consider the ESV's manuscript note before reading the longer ending with that qualification in view.

The women arrive to care for the one who died

Read Mark 16:1–4.

Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome buy spices after the Sabbath. They go to anoint Jesus, an act of care for his body. The previous chapter has established his death and burial; their purpose assumes that he remains dead. This is not a group arriving at the tomb already celebrating a resurrection.

Early on the first day of the week, after sunrise, they approach with a practical concern: who will move the stone? Mark has told us that Joseph rolled it across the entrance. Now its size receives emphasis. When the women look up, they discover that it has already been rolled back.

Mark does not describe the stone moving or tell us that the women saw Jesus leave the tomb. He directs our attention to what they find when they arrive. The obstacle they were discussing is no longer blocking the entrance, but they still need to understand what has happened.

Their love has taken the form of going, purchasing, and preparing. Yet the news awaiting them exceeds the care they intended to give. Christian hope begins with God's action, received through testimony, rather than with our ability to anticipate or accomplish it.

The announcement names both the crucified Jesus and his risen life

Read Mark 16:5–8.

Inside the tomb they see a young man in a white robe and are alarmed. Mark describes his appearance without explicitly calling him an angel. His place in the scene and his announcement identify him as God's messenger, the interpretation Strauss also follows.1

His words are specific. They are seeking Jesus of Nazareth, the one who was crucified. The announcement does not replace the suffering Jesus with another figure or explain away his death. The same Jesus has risen. The place where he was laid is empty.

The shared Resurrection Foundation explains why this is more than the survival of an inspiring memory. The news concerns Jesus himself, alive after death. Mark joins the cross and resurrection: the crucified one is the risen one.

The women are then sent to tell the disciples and Peter that Jesus is going before them to Galilee. Read Mark 14:27–31. Before the disciples scattered and Peter denied him, Jesus had already promised this meeting after his resurrection. The messenger's reminder directs them back to his word.

Peter's explicit inclusion matters in the light of his denial. Guzik reads the naming of Peter as a particular expression of restoring mercy.2 The passage does not narrate their reunion here, but it clearly includes him in the invitation. His failure has not made Jesus forget him. The shared Grace Foundation helps us receive this kindness without pretending the denial was harmless.

The women flee with trembling and astonishment. The scene closes with their fear and silence. We should let that unsettling response stand: hearing good news does not immediately produce composure. This verse does not tell us how long their silence lasted, so it should not be made into a claim that they never reported the news.

The promise to meet Jesus remains before them. The shared Discipleship Foundation describes learning to follow the Lord who speaks. Here that learning begins by taking his promise seriously even when the hearers are overwhelmed.

Why the ESV marks a longer ending

Before continuing, notice the ESV's editorial note and double brackets around the remaining verses. A manuscript is a handwritten copy of a text. The surviving copies of Mark do not all end in the same way. The ESV notes that some of the earliest manuscripts lack the longer ending, and its footnote describes other endings found in the manuscript tradition. This is a question about the transmission of these particular verses.

Strauss regards the longer ending as a later addition and favors an intentional ending at the women's fear. Guzik gives greater weight to its early reception and considers the possibility of an original ending lost in transmission.3 Whether Mark deliberately stopped at this point or an ending was lost is debated; the manuscript evidence does not let us reconstruct a lost ending with certainty.

There is also direct evidence that the longer ending was known early in Christian history. Irenaeus, in Against Heresies, quotes the ascension statement found in Mark 16:19 and identifies it as coming toward the conclusion of Mark.4 That is evidence of early use, though it does not by itself establish that Mark wrote the passage.

Readers can therefore acknowledge both its long reception in the church and the serious question about its originality. Keep that distinction visible while reading. In particular, do not build a unique teaching or practice on a disputed passage alone. The resurrection announcement already stands clearly in the account of the women at the tomb; it does not depend on resolving the longer ending's authorship.

The longer ending recounts appearances and resistance to testimony

Read Mark 16:9–14, within the ESV's brackets.

This section reports an appearance to Mary Magdalene and identifies her as someone from whom Jesus had cast out seven demons. She carries the news to those who had been with him, who are mourning and weeping. They refuse to believe that he is alive and that she has seen him.

Two others then encounter him while walking into the country. Their report also meets disbelief. The phrase about appearing in another form is not explained further here; the short account does not give enough detail to reconstruct exactly how they perceived him.

Finally, Jesus appears to the eleven and rebukes their unbelief and hardness of heart. In this account, the difficulty is more than sadness or initial surprise. They have refused the testimony of people who saw him alive. Grief is real, but it does not make every refusal to listen an act of wisdom.

The movement is from reports rejected to an encounter that confronts the rejection. The people who will carry the message first need their own resistance addressed. Receiving correction belongs within becoming a witness.

The commission sends the message outward

Read Mark 16:15–18, continuing within the longer ending.

The command is to take the gospel into all the world. The message is not to remain the possession of the small group that first received it. The shared Witness and Mission Foundation explains the outward movement of testimony about Jesus.

The next statement joins believing and being baptized with salvation, while its warning names unbelief as the ground of condemnation. Baptism is the visible act associated here with receiving the message. Christians differ over how to explain its precise relation to salvation. Guzik emphasizes the wording of the warning, which names unbelief rather than the absence of baptism.5 We should neither dismiss baptism nor use this disputed ending alone to settle the whole question. The passage treats the response to the gospel as consequential.

The promised signs concern deliverance from demons, new tongues, protection from serpents and poison, and healing. They are described as accompanying believers; they are not commands to seek danger. The sentence about poison is conditional, not an instruction to drink it. Picking up a serpent is likewise not presented as a ritual the church must perform.

The closing verse will explain the signs as confirmation of the message. Their purpose is testimony to the Lord's work, not a spectacle used to measure someone's worth or a guarantee that every believer will display each sign. Trust in Jesus is expressed by receiving and obeying him, not by manufacturing a hazardous test of his protection.

The risen Lord reigns while the message goes out

Read Mark 16:19–20, the conclusion of the longer ending.

Jesus is taken into heaven and sits at God's right hand, a position expressing royal authority. His departure is followed by the disciples going out to preach. The account does not describe the mission as human effort operating without him: the Lord works with them and confirms the message through accompanying signs.

The focus remains the proclaimed word and the Lord who makes it effective. The disciples act, yet they are not the source of the good news or its authority. The closing picture invites dependence as well as obedience.

At the end of our reading of Mark, return to the announcement that anchors the chapter: the Jesus who was crucified has risen. His followers have misunderstood, fled, and denied him, but his promise still stands. Receive that news before turning it into an assignment. Then let hope shape a faithful response to the living Lord.

Words of Wisdom

Let Jesus' resurrection and remembered promise give direction when fear or failure makes the way ahead hard to see. His faithfulness gives us reason to listen, receive mercy, and follow again.

A Prayer

Risen Lord Jesus, help me receive the news of your victory over death. Teach me to trust your word, accept your correcting mercy, and follow you with hope. Give me care in reading Scripture and courage to share the good news faithfully. Amen.

For a focused companion, read Receive the Hope That Includes You.

Sources Consulted

Source citations

  1. Mark L. Strauss, Mark commentary, on the messenger and the resurrection announcement. ↩

  2. David Guzik, authored Mark 16 commentary, on Peter's particular inclusion in the invitation. ↩

  3. Strauss and Guzik, the same commentaries, for their differing assessments of the longer ending and the abrupt close of the shorter account. The ESV's own manuscript note and footnote supply the textual qualification used here. ↩

  4. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, III.10.5, directly citing the ascension statement in Mark 16:19. ↩

  5. Guzik, the same authored commentary, on the distinction between the positive statement and the warning about unbelief. ↩

CARRY THIS WITH YOU

What is one thing you want to remember?

Your progress stays on this device.